HBOT for Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

UHMS-approved for serious CO poisoning — reduces delayed neurological sequelae at 2.5–3.0 ATA. Weaver 2002 NEJM protocol is the clinical standard.

HBOT Hub — http://localhost:3003/conditions/carbon-monoxide · Printed October 11, 2026 · UHMS approved · Emergency · NEJM-validated

GRADE Evidence Rating

Quality: High Strong recommendation

Weaver 2002 NEJM RCT + 6-year follow-up establish mortality/morbidity benefit. Weaver protocol is standard of care.

Overview

HBOT is UHMS-approved for severe carbon monoxide poisoning, defined by loss of consciousness, cardiovascular compromise, severe metabolic acidosis, or CO level >25%. The Weaver et al. 2002 NEJM trial demonstrated significant reduction in cognitive sequelae at 6 weeks and 12 months versus normobaric oxygen.

How HBOT Works

HBOT accelerates CO displacement from haemoglobin by elevating dissolved plasma oxygen and competing CO off haemoglobin binding sites. The CO half-life drops from ~5 hours on room air to ~20 minutes at 3.0 ATA with 100% oxygen. Beyond COHb clearance, HBOT reduces leukocyte-mediated reperfusion injury implicated in delayed neurological sequelae.

Clinical Protocol

Typical protocol1–3 sessions at 2.5–3.0 ATA, 90 minutes each (Weaver protocol)
Evidence levelStrong (RCT) — UHMS approved
FDA / regulatory statusFDA-approved indication

Weaver protocol: first session at 3.0 ATA for 60 minutes with air breaks, two subsequent sessions at 2.0 ATA for 60 minutes with air breaks, all within the first 24 hours. Pregnant patients and specific severe presentations may require additional sessions.

Cautions & Considerations

Key Research

Indexed studies

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

  1. Am I a candidate for HBOT for this condition given my medical history and current treatments?
  2. What pressure (ATA) and session count would you recommend, and why?
  3. Is treatment at this centre UHMS-accredited? What is the chamber type (monoplace or multiplace)?
  4. What is the expected response rate and typical timeline for improvement?
  5. What are the specific contraindications and side-effect risks in my case?
  6. What is the expected cost and insurance coverage status?
  7. What alternative or complementary treatments should I consider?
  8. How will we measure whether treatment is working?